Your Title

The Exclusive Report On Tehelka 15.1.2011‘The Muslim boy Kaleem pierced my conscience. I understood that love between two human beings is more powerful than the hatred between two communities’The Exclusive Report On Tehelka 15.1.2011 by ASHISH KHETAN

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Senior RSS men at blast accused's 2006 jamboree

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

2011, ഫെബ്രുവരി 24, വ്യാഴാഴ്‌ച

Terrorist attack was predicted


Praveen Swami
Architect of Lashkar's Akshardham temple attack had visited Bangalore



  • Officials, institutions were slow to address vulnerabilities


  • Bangalore has been on the Lashkar's list of targets for a while
    NEW DELHI: The Karnataka Government received a warning of an imminent terrorist strike in Bangalore less than a fortnight before Wednesday's attack in the Indian Institute of Science.
    Sources said the warning was based on an Intelligence Bureau operation that monitored communication between two Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives in New Delhi. Although intelligence sources admitted the warning did not contain information that could have enabled the Bangalore police to prevent the strike, they said officials and institutions had been slow to address their vulnerabilities.
    Lashkar operatives had been attempting to execute a major strike in Bangalore since 2001, in the months preceding the Jaish-e-Mohammad attack on Parliament House. Mohammad Arif `Ashfaq,' the Lashkar operative who recently received a death sentence for his role in the attack on the Red Fort in New Delhi, told his interrogators that a separate terror cell had been ordered to blow up information technology baron Azim Premji's farmhouse. Investigators believe that the 2001 plan collapsed because of the Lashkar's inability to recruit locals.At the end of the year, the Lashkar's structure was dislocated by the elimination of its top commander for all-India operations, code-named Abu Adnan, in an encounter in New Delhi. Lashkar activities were then scaled down by Pakistan's covert services during the 2001-02 India-Pakistan crisis to prevent a war-provoking incident.
    Lashkar's efforts
    By mid-2002, with the crisis out of the way, the Lashkar's efforts to target Bangalore were renewed.
    That summer, the BSF's General Branch — its cryptically-named intelligence wing — succeeded in eliminating the Lashkar's top leader in Jammu and Kashmir, Manzoor Zahid Chaudhuri, responsible for the 2002 attack on the Akshardham Temple in Gandhinagar and an attempt to storm the makeshift temple at the site of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya.
    From a laptop discovered in Chaudhuri's hideout, Indian intelligence gained insights into the existence of a growing Lashkar network operating out of Bangalore. Chaudhuri, it turned out, held discussions on potential targets with an undercover Lashkar operative code-named `Imran' planted in Bangalore several years earlier. Using the alias Mohammad Wasim Bhat, Chaudhuri stayed at the Vardhaman Hotel for several days in May 2002, before returning to Jammu through Chennai.
    The Lashkar continued to build its capability in Bangalore. Shahid Ahmad, a Pakistani national who took charge of all-India Lashkar operations in 2003, focussed on recruiting ethnic-Kashmiri students studying outside the State. Manzoor Chilloo, a Pune-based medical student, was tasked with facilitating an attack on the Mumbai Stock Exchange. Students in Bangalore were also approached, with some success.
    Evidence emerged in recent months that the Lashkar felt it now had the resources it needed to strike.
    In March, the Delhi police eliminated three Lashkar terrorists who had visited Bangalore in December 2004. Pakistani nationals Bilawal Ahmad and Mohammad Shahnawaz, along with a Patna resident Pervez Ahmed, are thought to have met local Lashkar contacts during their visit to their city. However, efforts to identify them again failed.
    Despite the successes Indian counter-terrorism organisations have registered against the Lashkar, the Pakistan-based group has proved remarkably resilient to high-level penetration.

  • A xenophobic agenda


    FRONTLINE 26.5.2001

    The Shiv Sena's support for the April 25 Maharashtra bandh and its renewed offensive on Mumbai's identity are part of an enterprise to end its moribund and discredited status.

    PRAVEEN SWAMI
    in Mumbai
    FEW observers paid attention when the Shiv Sena's would-be Fuhrer Bal Thackeray launched a savage attack on Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee last month. On April 8, Vajpayee told a rally in Mumbai that the Bharatiya Janata Party believed Mumbai should be "a city for all". Thackeray responded two days later, through the pages of his party organ Saamna, by putting the blame for all of Mumbai's problems on "people from Atal Behari Vajpayee and Laloo Prasad Yadav's States". "The only thing outsiders have brought to Mumbai," he told Saamna, "is population. They did not develop the city; they caused its deterioration. Because of them, the city's footpaths have disappeared, the crime rate has shot up, and the jungle of unauthorised constructions and slums have turned the whole of Mumbai into Dharavi (a slum). These people steal electricity and water, and encroach upon government land. They have transformed Mumbai into a toilet."
    Mumbai at dusk. The Shiv Sena's political aspirations could see the city turning into a communal cauldron yet again.
    Most people put the venom down to the kind of ritual political feuding that has characterised the Sena-BJP alliance, without endangering its existence. Days earlier, the Sena had pulled out of sharing a platform with Vajpayee at the rally, claiming it would not "justify the BJP's gross misdeeds". Given that its leading luminary and former Chief Minister Narayan Rane was to face High Court strictures for gross violations of regulations in land deals on April 9, this concern for propriety was more than a little ironic. But the Sena's anger with the BJP in the wake of the Tehelka scandal was not new. In late March, for example, Saamna had demanded that Vajpayee's son-in-law, Ranjan Bhattacharya, along with key aide Brajesh Mishra be divested of their respective roles in government. Shiv Sena politicians had also let it be known that their support for the National Democratic Alliance would be contingent on the government adopting a more hawkish policy in Jammu and Kashmir.
    It soon became clear that the attack on Vajpayee was part of a larger political project. On April 17, the Sena stunned analysts when it announced that it would join a Left-sponsored bandh to protest against the economic policies of both the State and Union governments. Thackeray's son and potential heir-apparent Uddhav Thackeray said he would be willing to "join hands with anyone to defend the interests of workers". A week later, Thackeray said he had told the party's three Union Ministers to oppose labour reforms designed to make retrenchment easier. The Left parties, which had planned the bandh for months, succeeded in organising an effective shutdown of Maharashtra on April 25, a demonstration of the depth of frustration brought about by shrinking employment opportunities and economic distress across the State. But the Sena had also succeeded in broadcasting its commitment to protecting the interests of its desperate lower-middle class and sub-proletarian constituency in Mumbai.
    The Maharashtrians' working class concerns, and anxieties about the ethnic character of Mumbai, have been used with skill by the Shiv Sena in the past. Maharashtrians form some 30 per cent of Mumbai's population, and their feeling of linguistic marginalisation has been manipulated by the Sena to fuel its xenophobic agenda. In a March 8 editorial in Saamna, Thackeray had provided a foretaste of his anti-north Indian migrant polemic by attacking the Mumbai Doordarshan Kendra's news chief, Bhupendra Kainthola. Kainthola, he demanded, had to be replaced by a Maharashtrian. Interestingly, politicians of the Muslim Right had prepared the ground for the new Sena offensive. The Muslim League demanded in March that Mumbai be sundered from the rest of the State on the grounds that the majority of its population was not from Maharashtra. The demand, for which there was little apparent provocation or support, was played up in the pro-Sena press.
    Sena support for the Maharashtra bandh and its renewed offensive on Mumbai's identity are part of a carefully constructed enterprise to aid its moribund and discredited organisation. The communal venom that brought the Sena spectacular gains in the 1990s has not been exhausted. But Hindutva is no longer in the foreground of Sena polemic. Three and a half decades after its formation, the Shiv Sena has begun to reinvent itself in its original form.
    History helps understand why the Sena has chosen to break from a narrow Hindutva agenda and seek a wider mass platform. When Thackeray addressed the Sena's first rally at Mumbai's Shivaji Park on October 30, 1966, he tapped the tensions created by industrial recession and urban decay. The Sena's agenda was securing employment for lower-middle class Maharashtrians, who, it claimed, had been denied white collar opportunities by migrants to Mumbai, mainly from Tamil Nadu. Thackeray's cadre spent their early years terrorising south Indian-owned enterprises, and compelling Mumbai offices and businesses to hire personnel through its union, the Sthaniya Lokadhikar Samiti (Local Peoples' Rights Committee). The campaign won the Sena support from many of Mumbai's Maharashtrian-origin residents, and also provided a lucrative source of revenue to party cadre.
    Such recruiting of regional chauvinism was instrumental to the Sena's subsequent political growth. Central to the success of this project was the feud between the Bombay Pradesh Congress Committee (BPCC) and the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee (MPCC). While the BPCC, the representative of high capital, had opposed the creation of the State of Maharashtra, the MPCC was made up of the new elites of rural western Maharashtra. The Sena's first electoral success, in the 1968 Mumbai municipal elections, was in large part the outcome of the BPCC-MPCC conflict. Then Chief Minister Vasantrao Patil arranged for questions to be raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Council, alleging that a Union government-sponsored plan was afoot to sunder Mumbai from Maharashtra. It was suggested that the plan had been authored by the BPCC's Murli Deora. Patil then promised never to allow the non-existent proposals to be realised. The Sena reaped the electoral harvest, winning 42 municipal seats.
    It is also instructive to note that opportunistic alliances have been a second key element of Sena strategy. Many of its collaborators have been improbable allies. It fought the 1973 Mumbai municipal elections, for example, in alliance with the pro-Dalit Republican Party of India, and then had its candidate elected as Mayor in a deal with the Muslim League, the socialists, the Congress(O), and both the BPCC and the MPCC; all these were wooed and in turn courted the Sena. The only consistent element in Sena politics was its hostile anti-communism, a project that had the gleeful support of both factions of the Congress. Through the 1970s, Sena gangs repeatedly attacked leading Communist trade union leaders, and in 1973 were responsible for the murder of popular Parel MLA Krishna Desai. It was only in 1984, with the Sena discredited as a criminal mafia and in electoral decline, that Thackeray sought alliances with the Hindu Right, first forming the Hindu Mahasangh, and then allying with the BJP.
    Violent riots, starting with the anti-Muslim pogroms in Bhiwandi, Kalyan and Thane, and through similar butchery at Panvel, Nashik, Nanded and Amravati, marked this new direction taken by the Sena. Although the organisation had historically been anti-Muslim, the posture of the post-1984 period was strikingly new. It was, for one, cast as part of a larger Hindutva project, not just regional antagonism. The Sena's Hindutva also allowed it to build bridges with those like south Indian Hindus, people it had only a decade ago represented as the enemy. Interestingly, Thackeray appears to have had some ambivalence about the new ideology until very late in the course of the Ram Janambhoomi agitation. Top Sena leaders only left for Ayodhya by train on December 5, 1992, ensuring they would not be there the next day. And while the Sena claimed to have mobilised thousands of kar sevaks, it in fact only sent some three dozen.
    The new-model Sena, or rather the reinvention of the old-model Sena, became evident at its 34th anniversary celebrations in June 2000. Thackeray's address was full of communal venom. "Muslims cannot be trusted," he said in the keynote address, "They are like snakes. You never know when they can turn around and bite you." But there were new elements as well. "Marathi industrialists like Kirloskar and Garware," he complained, "have been replaced by Marwari businessmen." The Sthaniya Lokadhikar Samiti's Gajanan Kiritkar gave express form to the new Sena thinking, arguing that "of the four parties in Maharashtra, we are the only one which is a truly regional party. Neither the BJP nor the Congress(I), not even the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), can meet regional aspirations." This was followed up with energetic campaigns to force shopkeepers to put up Marathi-language signboards, and demands for more recruitment of Maharashtrians in government-run institutions and corporations.
    Some critics believe that the broad Left is helping this new Shiv Sena agenda, albeit inadvertently. Leaders of the Congress(I) and the NCP, for example, believe that the Shiv Sena was the principal beneficiary of the Maharashtra bandh. "It's disgraceful," says a key aide of Deputy Chief Minister Chhagan Bhujbal, "for the Left to ally with Marathi chauvinism, no matter what the cause." But Left leaders rebut the argument, saying the real reasons for the Sena's revival lie in the flawed economic policies of the Congress (I) and the NCP. "This is a spurious position," argues Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Ashok Dhawale. "All the issues on which the bandh was called," he points out, "had been spearheaded by the Left for a number of years. The Sena just jumped on the bandwagon because of pressure from its own ranks. If only the NCP and the Congress(I) had taken issues like unemployment and anti-labour legislation seriously, the Sena would have been completely marginalised."
    And that, indeed, points to the real problems underpinning the Sena's slow, but evident, revival. Data on industry in Maharashtra points to declining organised sector employment. New jobs are being created, but only in small numbers, and largely in the unregulated informal sector, where both wages and working conditions are appalling. The number of jobs in Mumbai's textile mills, one of the worst victims of industrial decline over the last two decades, has fallen from over 2.5 lakh in 1981, to 30,000. At an April 31 trade union rally, where Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh shared a platform with Uddhav Thackeray, he held out few hopes of a better future. In the wake of the World Trade Organisation-propelled restructuring of the global economy, Deshmukh said, trade unions now had to adopt a "pragmatic approach to the welfare of workers". That is of little comfort to workers pushed to the wall by state laws enabling easier retrenchment, and freeing companies from many worker welfare rules.
    Chauvinist forces, both Hindu and Muslim, thrive in this kind of climate. In March, Hindu fundamentalists threatened to block the ritual sacrifice of animals by Muslims on Id, while the previous month saw rioting in Nashik after the local authorities demolished a mosque. The State government, sadly, chose to buckle in the face of pressure. Several people were arrested for having published a booklet critical of the Maratha king Shivaji in February, while actress Sonali Bendre was booked in late March for having posed in a short kurta bearing Hindu religious motifs. The Democratic Front government has even sought to compete with the Hindu Right, sponsoring official Shivaji jayanti celebrations in February. Muslim chauvinist organisations have done their bit too. The Muslim League claimed on February 12 that Hindu census enumerators were seeking to "conceal the real strength of Muslims". Its Mumbai president, Farooque Azam, proceeded to support the Mumbai serial bombings of 1993 and the Taliban's demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas on March 27.
    The success of the early Shiv Sena, wrote Jayant Lele in a 1995 essay, lay in the "unstable political context, and the growing inability of the state to govern. The Shiv Sena was in that context a populist eruption. It thrived parasitically on diffused and generalised discontent". Three decades on, things appear alarmingly similar.


    Hammer blow to Lashkar
    Praveen Swami 3.12.2005
    They crossed LoC on November 20 to carry out attacks

    NEW DELHI: In what experts are describing as a hammer blow to the Lashkar-e-Taiba's operations in Jammu and Kashmir, the police on Friday eliminated three top terrorists and encircled the organisation's overall commander for military operations.
    Ubaid-ur-Rahman, a resident of Mohalla Gulistan in Faisalabad, Mohammad Salim, of Lalookhet in Karachi, and Sadaqat Ali, of Wah Cantonment were killed in the course of the most successful counter-Lashkar operation in over a year. All the three militants are believed to have crossed the Line of Control on November 20, with instructions to carry out fidayeen (suicide-squad) attacks on targets in Srinagar.
    Sources told The Hindu the Jammu and Kashmir police that the authorities encircled the Lashkar's overall commander for military operations, Mohammad Rashid Sulfi. Sulfi, who narrowly escaped a joint Intelligence Bureau and police operation which led to the arrest of over a dozen Lashkar operatives in 2004, is believed to have ordered several high-profile attacks, including the recent assassination of Jammu and Kashmir Minister Ghulam Nabi Lone, and an abortive 2004 attempt on the life of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
    Jammu and Kashmir police investigators, the sources said, were led to the Lashkar unit in the course of an investigation into a November 30 bank robbery. On Thursday, the State police arrested Srinagar residents Shakeel Ahmad Sofi and Shabbir Ahmad Bukhari for their alleged role in the armed robbery. Searches at their home near the Kashmir University campus led to the surprise recovery of ammunition, grenades and a satellite phone concealed inside a washing machine — equipment typically used by terrorists, not bank robbers.
    Interrogation of Bukhari and Sofi led to the revelation that the robbery had been carried out to finance the Lashkar's operations in the Srinagar area. In recent weeks, the Lashkar carried out several high profile bombings and suicide squad attacks in and around Jammu and Kashmir's summer capital, but was facing a funds crunch because of the disruption of its infrastructure in the wake of the October 8 earthquake in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.
    Sofi, the investigators have found, used his connections in the State Youth Congress to obtain documents identifying himself and the three killed Pakistanis as members of the organisation. Sofi had joined the National Conference in 2002 and was given official accommodation at the Dolphin Hotel in Srinagar after he claimed he faced terrorist threats.
    He joined the Youth Congress recently, and continued to use his political work as cover for his activities as a Lashkar operative.

    Dilemma for Pakistan's leadership


    Praveen Swami 18.5.2005
    For Pakistan, ending violence in Jammu and Kashmir isn't a concession to India; it concerns its own future as a viable, modern nation-state.




    PUBLIC OUTCRY: Student activists in Srinagar protest against the recent killings in Jammu and Kashmir. — Photo: PTI

    EVEN AS Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf was finalising preparations for his summit meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last month, the Lashkar-e-Taiba had set about realising a rather different agenda.
    Late on the night of April 14, a group of Lashkar terrorists entered the home of Mohammad Shafi at the village of Bathoi, near Mahore in Jammu province. Shafi had opposedjihadi groups in the area; that evening, he paid for it with his life. Later that night, the terrorists made their way to the nearby home of Qamar-ud-Din, where, this time they chose to behead their victim. Roshan Din, their third victim of the night, was also ritually decapitated.
    Euphoria punctured
    Two high-profile bomb attacks in Srinagar this month have punctured the post-summit euphoria, and some commentators have started to wonder if dialogue and death can coexist. The question now being posed is not just the outcome of the bombings, but also decades of mistrust: is Pakistan really willing to sever its relationship with jihadigroups, or does it still see their activities as a negotiating tool? Is the peace process for real?
    To students of terrorist violence, there is nothing particularly surprising about the violence now under way in Jammu and Kashmir. As the scholar Steven Cohen has pointed out in his recent book, The Idea of Pakistan, terrorism serves objectives that transcend its purely military significance. Its principal purpose is, instead, to transform the ways in which civil society comprehends reality, through "a theatrical performance of increasingly unimaginable horror."
    What is the point of this theatre? As India-Pakistan dialogue proceeds, jihadi groups are certain to use their single source of legitimacy, which is violence, to secure a place at the negotiation table, directly or through proxy. Hard-hit by aggressive counter-terrorist operations, which have decimated the command-level leadership of groups such as the Hizb-ul-Mujaheddin and the Lashkar, jihadiorganisations need to demonstrate that they can still wield coercive authority over civil society. With Pakistan having scaled back support to terrorist groups, it is also essential for their leadership to show signs of life to their increasingly-sceptical supporters.
    U.S. pressure
    General Musharraf may or may not have arrived in New Delhi with a new heart, but his actions have indeed given evidence of something more meaningful: a new pragmatic mind. The United States has placed intense pressure on Pakistan to cut back its support for the jihad in Jammu and Kashmir, fearful that another crisis in South Asia might derail its objectives in Afghanistan and elsewhere. More important, Pakistan is confronted with multiple internal challenges, from both Islamists and nationalists such as those fighting Pakistani forces in Balochistan. It cannot afford an external crisis as well. Even the prospect of an India-Pakistan war imposes disproportionate costs on Pakistan, and could undo the fragile economic gains General Musharraf's regime has succeeded in securing.
    Pakistan, then, needs peace for hard-headed reasons, not some emotive urge for reconciliation with India. It seems unwilling, however, to altogether demobilise its secret army. While cross-border infiltration has dropped sharply, training camps continue to exist as does much other jihadist infrastructure. The April 7 issue of the Lashkar-affiliated magazine Ghazwa carried advertisements for a new network of schools which would give students a modern education, but "also prepare your children for jihad." The same issue also proclaimed that the Lashkar was recruiting cadre from amongst Muslims in India, for a war it believes is not just for the liberation of Jammu and Kashmir, but against `Hindu' India as a whole.
    What reason could there be for General Musharraf's unwillingness to rid himself of such allies? For all its military influence in Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan has little political clout. Its most visible supporter, Islamist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani, has failed to create a significant mass constituency for his Tehreek-e-Hurriyat. Centrists in the All Parties Hurriyat Conference have long been disenchanted with Pakistan. As such, it has little choice other than to seek representation through the jihadis. It is not, however, a policy without risk: as the December 2001 attack on Parliament House illustrated, any level of terrorism contains within it the risk of calamity-inducing crisis.
    Is this a reason for India to go slow on, or pull back from, the peace process? Quite the contrary. Pakistan has long seen the jihad in Jammu and Kashmir as a cost-free method of securing leverage — or, if nothing else, imposing costs upon its historic rival, India. After the Pokhran II nuclear tests of May 1998, Pakistani strategists came to believe this enterprise would be cost-free. Now, it is starting to become clear, the jihadis have inflicted costs on Pakistan, too: economic, social and institutional. Constructive engagement will bring home the fact that ending violence in Jammu and Kashmir isn't a concession to India, or even to the State's long-suffering people: it is, in fact, an issue that concerns Pakistan's own future as a viable, modern nation-state.

    Behind the Batla House shootout


    Praveen Swami 10.10.2008
    Charges that the Jamia Nagar encounter was fake belong in the Wonderland.



    The scene near Batla House, Jamia Nagar, after the police gunned down two terror suspects and arrested a person on September 19.

    “Sometimes,” said the Queen in Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland, “I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”
    Ever since last month’s encounter in New Delhi’s Jamia Nagar, critics have been claiming that the two men killed by the police were innocent students, not Indian Mujahideen terrorists. A number of well-meaning commentators and politicians have expressed concern over the encounter. Few seem to have paused to wonder if there was, in fact, anything mysterious about the shootout. If it was indeed fake, the story would read something like this: Hoping to redeem their anti-terrorism credentials and whip up anti-Muslim paranoia, the Delhi police shot dead two innocent Muslims. For some reason, though, they left a third innocent Muslim, Mohammad Saif, alive to tell the tale. Either because of incompetence or to get rid of an inconvenient honest officer, depending on who is telling the story — the Delhi police also killed one of their own. They also shot another officer, but let him live.
    A riveting fiction? The truth about Batla House is, in comparison, mundane.
    When inspector Mohan Chand Sharma walked through the door of the flat where he was to die, all he knew was that he was looking for a man with two missing front teeth. Soon after the Gujarat bombings, a Bharuch resident contacted the police to report that the vehicles used as car bombs in Ahmedabad had been parked by his tenant. Gujarat Crime Branch Deputy Commissioner Abhay Chudasma had little to go on, bar one small clue: the mobile phone used by the tenant to communicate with the landlord. It turned out that the phone went silent after the Ahmedabad bombings.
    Based on the interrogation of suspects, Gujarat police investigators determined that the cell phone was one of the five used by the perpetrators between July 7 and 26 — the day of the serial bombings. They learned that the perpetrators had observed rigorous communication security procedures, calling these numbers only from public telephones. Between July 16 and July 22, the investigators learned, another of the five Gujarat phones had been used in the Jamia Nagar area. This phone had received just five calls, all from public phones at Jamia Nagar. Then, on July 24, the phone became active again in Ahmedabad.
    The investigators also found evidence of a second link between the Ahmedabad bombings and the Jamia Nagar area. On July 19, the Bharuch cell phone received a call from Mumbai, made from an eastern Uttar Pradesh number — the sole break in the communication-security procedure. Immediately after this, a call was made from the eastern U.P. phone to a number at Jamia Nagar, registered to local resident Mohammad Atif Amin. The authorities mounted a discreet watch on his phone but decided not to question him in the hope that he would again be contacted by the perpetrators.
    Mumbai police crime branch chief Rakesh Maria made the next breakthrough last month, when his investigators held Afzal Usmani, a long-standing lieutenant of ganglord-turned-jihadist Riyaz Bhatkal. From Usmani, the investigators learned that top commander ‘Bashir’ and his assault squad left Ahmedabad on July 26 for a safe house at Jamia Nagar. Armed with this information, the investigators came to believe that Atif Amin either provided Bashir shelter or the two were one and the same person. Inspector Sharma was asked to settle the issue.
    ‘Vodaphone salesman’
    Sub-inspector Dharmindar Kumar was given the unhappy task of trudging up the stairs in the sweltering heat, searching for Bashir. Dressed in a tie and shirt, just like other members of Sharma’s team, Kumar pretended to be a salesman for Vodaphone. At the door of Amin’s flat, he heard noises — and called his boss.
    According to head constable Balwant Rana, who was by Sharma’s side, the two men knocked on the front door, identifying themselves as police officers. There was no response. Then, the officers walked down an ‘L’ shaped corridor which led to a second door. This door was unlocked. Sharma and Rana, as they entered, were fired upon from the front of and to the right of the door. When the rest of the special team, armed only with small arms, went in to support Sharma and Rana, two terrorists ran out through the now-unguarded front door. Saif wisely locked himself up in a toilet.
    It takes little to see that Sharma’s team made several tactical errors. However, as anyone who has actually faced hostile fire will testify, combat tends not to be orderly. In the United States or Europe, a Batla House-style operation would have been carried out by a highly trained assault unit equipped with state-of-the-art surveillance equipment. Given their resources and training, Sharma and his men did as well as could be expected.
    Judging by Sharma’s injuries, as recorded by doctors at the Holy Family Hospital in New Friend’s Colony and later re-examined at the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences’ Trauma Centre, he was fired at from two directions. One bullet hit him in the left shoulder and exited through the left upper arm; the other hit the right side of the abdomen, exiting through the hip. The investigators believe that the abdomen wound was inflicted with Amin’s weapon and the shoulder hit, by Mohammad Sajid.
    Much has been made of a newspaper photograph which shows that Sharma’s shirt was not covered in blood, with some charging that it demonstrates he was shot in the back. Forensic experts, however, note that bleeding from firearms injuries takes place through exit wounds — not, as in bad pop films, at the point of entry. In the photograph, signs of a bullet having ripped through Sharma’s shirt are evident on his visible shoulder; so, too, is evidence of the profuse bleeding from the back.
    In some sense, the allegations levelled over the encounter tell us more about the critics than the event itself. In part, the allegations have been driven by poor reporting and confusion — the product, more often than not, by journalists who have not followed the Indian Mujahideen story. More important, though, the controversy was driven by the Muslim religious right-wing whose myth-making, as politician Arif Mohammad Khan recently pointed out, has passed largely unchallenged.
    In a recent article, the University of Delaware’s Director of Islamic Studies, Muqtedar Khan, lashed out at the “intellectually dishonest” representatives of Muslims who “live in denial.” “They first deny that there is such a thing as jihadi terrorism,” Dr. Khan noted, “resorting to conspiracy theories blaming every act of jihadi violence either on Israel, the U.S. or India. Then they argue that unjust wars by these three nations [in Palestine, Iraq and Kashmir] are the primary cause for jihadi violence; a phenomenon whose very existence they have already denied.”
    It is easy to rip apart the pseudo-facts that drove the claim that the Jamia Nagar encounter was fake — or that the Indian Mujahideen is a fiction. Much political work, though, is needed to drain the swamps of denial and deceit in which the lies have bred.

    The spreading tentacles of terror


    31.8.2003
    Kashmir is just a bridgehead for a larger war on the whole of India. Praveen Swami on the jehadis' gameplan.





    Mumbai was a picture of chaos on the day of the blasts but the day after, the routine returned...

    IN MARCH 2002, the Lashkar-e-Taiba's website welcomed visitors with a picture of Qutubuddin Ansari, the Ahmedabad riot victim, photographed begging for his life as his home burned and his neighbours were butchered. "Don't you think," the caption read, "he should have a gun instead?" Earlier this week, when two Research Department explosive-packed car bombs went off in the heart of south Mumbai, it became clear that at least a few people had been listening to the LeT. Yet there is little understanding in India of either the ideology or the objectives of the jehadi religious right. The Islamists' jehad is seen, for the most part, as a war for Jammu and Kashmir which occasionally spills into other parts of India. For the Islamist right, however, Jammu and Kashmir is just a bridgehead for a far larger war on the whole of India.
    How does this war actually work? In popular imagination, the Mumbai mafia occupies a central place in the working of Islamist warfare in India. The belief is not without basis. The mafia of Dawood Ibrahim Kaksar organised and executed the Mumbai serial bombings of 1993, the worst single act of Islamist terrorism in India. The Dawood mafia used its existing trafficking resources, notably the marine fleet of the Karachi-based smugglers, to move the explosives used in the serial bombings. Its personnel then set up the bombs, and helped the perpetrators escape to Karachi.
    There are at least two reasons for a mafia network that mainly worshipped money to join the armies of jehad. One, of course, was vengeance. Mumbai witnessed one of India's worst communal riots in 1992-1993, in the wake of the demolition of the Babri Masjid. Dawood Ibrahim, who had assiduously cultivated legitimacy as a defender of the city's Muslims, came under pressure to come good on his promises. The mafia, thus, set itself up as a Muslim avenger of the depredations of the Shiv Sena and the Mumbai Police, well documented by the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission of Inquiry.
    Another possibility is that the mafia just had no choice. By the early 1990s, the decontrol of gold and silver brought the prices of these commodities tumbling down, stripping smugglers of their principal business.




    The tourists were back at the Gateway of India. So were the pigeons.

    The mafia now turned to heroin, but the new business came at a price. Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence now began to lean on smugglers, allowing them to ship heroin only if they transported weapons and explosives as well. A twist in economic policy and a communal riot had placed an avowedly secular mafia under the thumb of the military-mullah combine which runs the ISI.
    Signs of this new alliance were evident by 1992. That year, Operation K2, an ambitious plan for joint operations by the Khalistan and Kashmir terrorists, was put in place by the ISI's handler for the Babbar Khalsa International, Waqar Ahmad. The plan envisaged the use of smugglers to move weapons across the Rann of Kutch for eventual deployment by terrorists. Indian intelligence officials claim that Lal Singh, a top Khalistan terrorist recruited by Ahmad who was arrested in July that year, had planned to blow up the stock exchange in Chennai using smuggled explosives.
    Smuggling and terror
    Despite the failure of K2, and the embarrassment caused by the discovery of its role in the Mumbai serial bombings, the ISI continued to give the mafia-terrorist relationship a formal shape. At the end of 1994, it organised the formation of the Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Front. In 1995, the JKIF advertised its relations with the mafia by releasing a photograph of one of the key accused in the serial bombings, Abdul Razzak `Tiger' Memon, along with its leader, Sajjad Keno. The photograph, it was claimed in an effort to take the heat off the ISI for harbouring Memon in Karachi, had been taken in Srinagar. One of the participants in the affair, Usman Majid, has since publicly confirmed long-standing speculation that it was in fact shot at a safe house in Muzaffarabad, Pakistan. Among the JKIF's more murderous acts was the bombing of the busy Lajpat Nagar market in New Delhi in 1996, which claimed a dozen lives.
    The explosives for this bombing operation were later discovered to have been smuggled into India by `Chhota' Javed Khan, who was arrested in Ahmedabad on June 2, 1996, along with Ayub Ahmad Bhatt and the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir resident, Abdul Rashid Jalaluddin. The group's leader, Kishtwar-resident Abdul Ghani Ghoni, told interrogators that their safehouses and weapons at Ahmedabad had been organised by Abdul Latif Abdul Wahab Sheikh, Dawood Ibrahim's associate.
    Although the JKIF is now believed to be largely defunct, the interrogation of alleged ISI operatives picked up in Mumbai has also thrown up the name of its highest surviving leader, Bilal Baig. Samshad Haider, operating under the alias of Raj Kumar, and Javed Ghulam Hussain were arrested in Mumbai for carrying out a series of six bomb blasts in Mumbai between August 28, 1997, and February 27, 1998. Both named Baig as a key contact.
    Sometimes, as the case of Hyderabad-resident Abdul Aziz Sheikh illustrates, the lines between the mafia and the jehadis can be blurred. Well known to Andhra Pradesh police officials as `Bombay Javed' because of his past history of extortion and theft in that city, Sheikh rejoined the mafia of `Chhota' Shakeel Ahmad Babu after training with the LeT in Pakistan. He was subsequently arrested after a July 1999 attempt on the life of the former Mumbai mayor, Milind Vaidya. At the time of his arrest, Sheikh was in a Lucknow hotel room, waiting for an arms courier to arrive from Kathmandu.
    Like other terrorist groups, the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen has flirted with the idea of expanding pan-India operations by using mafia structure. In 1998, the Jammu and Kashmir Police's Special Operations Group recovered extensive handwritten notes from the slain Hizb `commander,' Ali Mohammad Dar's Srinagar hideout. "Ways and means should be found," Dar had written, "to launch the movement in India on [a] priority basis." "Kingpins of the underworld [should] be contacted," he had advocated "to have the weapons and ammunition launched for us through other possible ways." Dar's project went with him to his grave — but no one really knows for certain.
    The jehad channel
    Early this month, officials of the Border Security Force shot dead the LeT commander, Manzoor Zahid Chaudhuri. Documents found in the terrorists' hideout showed that he had played a key role in organising the attack on the Akshardham temple in Gujarat a year ago. His associates? A businessman and some local officials. But not one mafia member.
    By the coming of the new millennium, the jehadis in Pakistan had gathered enough confidence to break with the mafia. Dozens of terrorist cells directly operated by groups such as LeT have been discovered nationwide and the arrest and elimination of terrorists now takes place with disquieting frequency.
    The foundations for this independent jehadi infrastructure were laid in 1985, when activists of the Ahl-e-Hadis sect's ultra-conservative Gorba faction gathered in Mumbai to organise armed Muslim resistance. Two key figures were present at that meeting: Azam Ghauri, who went on to form a LeT-based unit in Andhra Pradesh, and Abdul Karim `Tunda,' nicknamed for his deformed arm, who later became the Lashkar's top operative in India.
    Among their most enthusiastic recruits was Jalees Ansari, the son of a textile mill worker. Ansari's father, who had arrived as a penniless labourer from Uttar Pradesh, managed to save enough to give his children a future. In 1972, Ansari graduated from the Maratha College at Nagpara, and went on to study medicine. Despite his success, Ansari felt embittered by what he perceived as pervasive religious intolerance. The demolition of the Babri Masjid and the riots that followed made him — and his organisation — snap. Led by Ghauri and Karim, Ansari helped set off a series of 43 explosions in Mumbai and Hyderabad and seven separate explosions on trains on December 6, 1993, the first anniversary of the Babri Masjid demolition.
    Jehadi groups were quick to cash in on the fury of the young who had grown up in the ugly climate generated by pogrom after pogrom, a fury represented by those present at the 1985 meeting in Mumbai. One of Tunda's most effective recruits, for example, was the New Delhi resident, Amir Hashim. Code-named Kamran, Hashim left India as a teenager to live with his sister in Pakistan, believing he had no future in this country. He was then recruited by the LeT, and executed a series of bomb explosions in New Delhi, Rohtak and Jalandhar.
    How did such recruitment work? For one, the jehadi groups consciously despatched their top personnel to recruit from riot-hit areas. In August 1999, the Jammu and Kashmir Police had arrested an 11-member Lashkar team led by the Pakistan national, Amir Khan. Khan had been tasked to recruit Indian members whose immediate family had been killed in communal violence. Having obtained Indian educational documents and a driver's licence with the aid of some Bhiwandi residents, Khan planned to marry into a family living in Bhiwandi, Maharashtra.
    Similarly, top Lashkar activist Mohammad Salim Junaid, a resident of Kala Gujran village in Pakistan's Jhelum district, made deep links in the local community using SIMI volunteers. Junaid had begun his career with the Lashkar in 1991, as a foot soldier for the jehad in Jammu and Kashmir, rising rapidly through the organisation's hierarchy as a protégé of Azam Cheema, in charge of the LeT's trans-border movements. Junaid married a Hyderabad woman and set up a spare-parts export enterprise. Azam Ghauri himself is known to have attended a SIMI conference at Aurangabad in November 2000 to recruit volunteers.
    In the weeks preceding the Mumbai bombings, evidence has surfaced that local recruitment by jehadi groups has reached new levels. Upwards of 40 Gujarat residents, for example, are believed to be at the Lashkar training camps in Pakistan. In New Delhi, intelligence officials believe at least half-a-dozen terrorist cells are active in Maharashtra, each operating independently of the other. It is also clear that the Lashkar remains willing to invest in its all-India operations. Intelligence officials believe that a replacement is already in place for Faisal Khan, the southern region `commander' shot dead in Mumbai's Goregaon area this March. It is possible that the Lashkar facilitated the provision of RDX for the recent twin blasts.
    Policemen and intelligence work will, without dispute, lead to the arrest or elimination of whoever carried out the tragic twin blasts in Mumbai. That will not, however, stop the next one from taking place. The Lashkar sowed its seed in India's only-too-fertile communal fields, and is now reaping the harvest. For this political problem, however, India's leaders, Hindu or Muslim, seem to have no solutions to offer.

    The war against popular Islam -Praveen Swami


    12.10.2007
    Islamist groups have made no secret of their loathing for the Ajmer Sharif shrine


    — Photo Courtesy: Rajasthan Patrika

    The spot where the bomb blast took place in Ajmer dargah.

    NEW DELHI: The highest form of worship, wrote saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, is “to redress the misery of those in distress, to fulfil the needs of the helpless and to feed the hungry.”
    Thursday’s bombing of the saint’s shrine at Ajmer — the third in a series of attacks on Muslim religious institutions after the 2006 bombing of a Sufi shrine in Malegaon and this summer’s strike at the Mecca Masjid in Hyderabad — have been characterised as attempts to provoke a pan-India communal war. But the bombings also reflect another less-understood project: the war of Islamist neoconservatives against the syncretic traditions and beliefs that characterise popular Islam in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
    Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti is, almost without dispute, the most venerated Sufi saint of South Asia. Born in 1141 C.E., Chishti is believed to have studied at the great seminaries of Samarkand and Bukhara before travelling to India. Ajmer emerged as an important centre of pilgrimage during the sixteenth century, after Emperor Akbar undertook a pilgrimage on foot to the saint’s grave.
    Chishti’s order laid stress on seven principles, notably the renunciation of material goods, financial reliance on farming or alms, independence from economic patronage from the established political order, the sharing of wealth, and respect for religious differences.
    Chishti’s doctrine on the “highest form of worship” led to the saint often being described as the Garib Nawaz, or emperor of the poor. Several of the most famous Sufi shrines in South Asia – notably that of Fariduddin Ganj-i Shakar at Pakpattan in Pakistan, and that of Nizamuddin Awliya in New Delhi – were born of Chisti’s teachings.
    Over the centuries, they have come to command a massive multi-faith following, attracting Muslims, Hindus and Christians alike. For that precise reason, they have long been under attack from religious neoconservatives.
    Islamist critics of Sufism have made no secret of their loathing for shrines like that at Ajmer, which they claim propagate the heresy of ‘shirk’ – an Arabic term commonly translated to mean polytheism, but which is also used to refer to the veneration of saints and even atheism.
    South Asian terror groups associated with recent attacks on Muslim shrines — notably the Lashkar-e-Taiba — draw theological inspiration from the Salafi sect, a neoconservative tradition also sometimes referred to as Wahabbism. Salafi theologians are intensely hostile to Sufi orders like that founded by Chishti, characterising them as apostasy.
    In The General Precepts of the Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaah, a pamphlet which propounds the Salafi doctrine, theologian Shaykh Naasir al’Aql, sharply criticises religious practices “where the dead are taken as intermediaries between a person and Allah, supplicating them and seeking the fulfilment of one’s needs through them, seeking their assistance and other similar acts.”
    Al’Aql, whose work is often drawn on by Lashkar ideologues, argues that “every avenue that leads to shirk in the worship of Allah, or innovations in religion – it is obligatory to forbid it.” Another pamphlet available on the website of the Lashkar’s parent organisation, the Pakistan-based Jamaat-ud-Dawa, rails against shrines, demanding that “Muslim leaders combat and uproot this phenomenon.” Just how this is to be done, the Jamaat-ud-Dawa does not say – but Lashkar cadre have left little to the imagination.
    Terror groups in Jammu and Kashmir have frequently targeted regional religious institutions that draw on the same syncretic traditions as that at Ajmer. In June, 2005, for example, the Lashkar-e-Taiba was held responsible for the attempted assassination of north Kashmir mystic Ahad B’ab Sopore. Eyewitnesses said the assassination attempt, in which one person was killed and nine were injured, was carried out by Qayoom Nassar, a well-known Sopore-based Lashkar operative.
    Lashkar cadre are also thought to be responsible for a May 2005 arson attack that led to the destruction of the 14th century shrine of the saint Zainuddin Wali at Ashmuqam in south Kashmir. Ashmuqam was earlier subjected to several grenade attacks, leading to disruption of festive days there for several years. A month later, Lashkar operative Bilal Magray was arrested on charges of having thrown a hand grenade at a Sufi congregation in Bijbehara, injuring 15 people. Dozens of similar attacks have taken place over the years.
    In 2000, Lashkar terrorists destroyed sacramental tapestries Bafliaz residents had offered at the shrine of Sayyed Noor, one of the most venerated Sufi saints in the region. As early as June 1994, Lashkar terrorists stormed the historic Baba Reshi shrine at Tangmarg and fired on pilgrims.
    Perhaps, the most prominent incident in the campaign was the October 1995 siege of the Hazratbal shrine in Srinagar, which houses a relic claimed to be a hair of Prophet Mohammad. The terrorists threatened to blow up the shrine unless troops, who had surrounded them, were withdrawn. A similar siege at Chrar-e-Sharif in May 1996 led to the destruction of the town’s famous 700-year-old shrine. Despite these attacks, popular Islam in Jammu and Kashmir has held its own – as it is likely to do elsewhere in India, too.

    A tragedy foretold -Praveen Swami


    12.7.2006
    It could take months to identify the perpetrators of the Mumbai bombings, but the recent past holds some clues.

    TUESDAY'S MURDEROUS terror bombing in Mumbai was a tragedy foretold. A least half-a-dozen Lashkar-e-Taiba and Harkat ul-Jihad Islami cells planning major operations in western India had been interdicted since January: one, sooner or later, was certain to penetrate India's police and intelligence defences.
    Investigators have already begun work that could led them to the perpetrators of the single worst terrorist outrage since the Mumbai serial bombings of 1993. Dozens of shards of forensic evidence, hundreds of phone calls in and out of Mumbai, the testimonies of thousands of witnesses will have to be carefully studied before even preliminary suggestions about just who might have been responsible can be arrived at.
    What evidence is available, though, suggests that the tactics and techniques used in the Mumbai bombings are similar to those deployed in the wave of strikes that have taken place across India since the end of 2005. Fabricated from easily-available chemicals such as potassium permanganate or aluminium chlorate, with small amounts of RDX to accelerate the detonation, the kinds of explosives that seem to have been used in Mumbai are easy to manufacture — and lethal when used in crowded locations.
    If recent experience is a guide, investigators are likely to find that the real architects of the bombing are outside its reach: the Lashkar is headquartered at Muridke, near Lahore, while the HuJI operates out of bases in Dhaka and Chittagong. More likely than not, though, the operation will have been facilitated by local operatives of these terror groups — part of a subterranean but still enormously dangerous movement of small numbers of recruits into the ranks of Islamist terror groups.
    Whichever terror group executed Tuesday's bombing is likely to have drawn at least some of its operatives from the large pool of former Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) members in Maharashtra — an organisation that has survived a ban imposed in 2001 by operating under a variety of cover names. Several of the 11 Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives arrested from the Aurangabad area in May, while attempting to move a shipment of explosives, assault rifles, and grenades into Gujarat, had worked for SIMI before it was proscribed.
    Zainuddin Ansari, the still-untraced head of the cell, had also worked as a SIMI ansar, or full-time activist, for several years. Another member of the cell, Shakeel Ahmad Shaikh, had been known to Indian intelligence since at least 1999, when he delivered an incendiary speech at a SIMI convention in Aurangabad. The Lashkar's then commander for its operations in Hyderabad, Azam Ghauri, was among those present at the convention, where the institutional links between SIMI and the terror group became evident for the first time.
    Lashkar operatives seemed to have used contacts built from that convention onwards to recruit cadre in recent years. Interestingly, several of the members of the Aurangabad cell were well-educated. Sharif Ahmad, who was detained in Aurangabad on May 15, was a doctor, while Sayyed Jafaruddin was in the second year of a Bachelor of Science programme. Bilal Ansari, another member of the cell, was a professional calligrapher, while one of the men still wanted for questioning, Zahibuddin Ansari, worked as an electrician.
    However, the Lashkar has also attempted to tap the estimated 3,000 seminaries in Maharashtra, where an estimated 200,000 students study. Irfan Moinuddin Attar, a Lashkar operative who was killed on May 30, 2006, while training with a Hizb-ul-Mujahideen unit in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama district, had studied at seminaries at Shirol and Udgam in Kolhapur. Investigators believe he also attempted to recruit for the Lashkar from amongst seminary students in Gujarat — but with little success.
    A wide canvas
    SIMI's network, though, extends across much of India — a fact that has made it the principal ally of almost all major Islamist terrorist groups. Former SIMI ansars have played a key role in several major terror strikes in northern India, as investigations into the July 28, 2005, bombing of the Shramjeevi Express at Jaunpur, and the Varanasi serial bombings of March 7, 2006, demonstrated. In both cases, the links of SIMI cadre with the Bangladesh-based Harkat-ul-Jihad Islami were instrumental in the action of the strikes.
    Mohammad Walliullah, the 32-year-old cleric from the village of Phulpur who is now facing trial for having organised the Varanasi bombings, was a SIMI ansar who had served time in jail for harbouring Jaish-e-Mohammad cadre. Among his closest associates in SIMI was Mohammad Zubair, the HuJI terrorist from Bharaich in Uttar Pradesh who was killed in a recent encounter with the Jammu and Kashmir police at Handwara, along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir.
    Intelligence sources told The Hindu that SIMI's Bangladesh links had been forged during its dealings with the Islami Chattra Shibir, the students wing of Bangladesh's Jamaat-e-Islami — contacts that were entirely legal before the Islamist group was proscribed. Both Waliullah and Zubair were recruited by one-time activists of the Islamic Chattra Shabir who had gone on to join the HuJI. HuJI cadre from Bangladesh executed the bombings — but Waliullah and Zubair provided the safehouses and guides necessary for a successful strike.
    SIMI cadre, interestingly, also appear to have attempted to expand their presence in southern India. According to an official declaration before the tribunal that examined the legality of the ban on SIMI, its one-time cadre in the State had begun to develop links with the Lashkar.
    SIMI, the Kerala Government believes, operates through 12 front organisations engaged in charitable work, two of which are based in the State capital, Thiruvananthapuram, and a third in Kochi.
    In West Bengal, too, former SIMI cadre have attempted to draw new recruits from seminaries, religious associations, libraries and other community bodies — all legitimate enterprises. In the summer of 2003, for example, Islami Chattra Shibir activist Jamaluddin Chowdhury is believed to have taken seven men from an education camp organised by former SIMI operatives for training at a HuJI-linked seminary. Islamist mobilisation in Bangladesh is a source of considerable concern for the West Bengal Government.
    Uttar Pradesh authorities, though, remain curiously reluctant to act against key SIMI figures. In May, an Uttar Pradesh Home Department spokesperson asserted that the State Government would not support an extension of the proscription of SIMI, claiming that it was not involved in "any [terrorist] activities" — a proposition undermined by the State police's own investigation into the Varanasi bombing. Local politics has long complicated counter-terrorism work in the state, a problem that needs to be addressed.
    Policing and intelligence work helped prevent at least a dozen major terrorist strikes just this year. What the Mumbai strikes have made clear, though, is that India must prepare itself for a long and brutal war ahead.

    2011, ഫെബ്രുവരി 16, ബുധനാഴ്‌ച

    Article LINKS

    ‘അസീമാനന്ദ ഹിന്ദു-മുസ്‌ലിം ഐക്യത്തിനായി ശ്രമിച്ചു’:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/02/blog-post.html

    നല്ല ഭീകരത, ചീത്ത ഭീകരത:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_27.html

    ഭീകരതയുടെ കുത്തക മുസ്‌ലിംകള്‍ക്കോ?:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_23.html

    അസിമാനന്ദയും കാളിദാസനും:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_21.html

    "എല്ലാ ഭീകരവാദികളും മുസ്‌ലിംകളാണ്‌":
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_19.html

    പ്രവാചകനിന്ദ: ശിക്ഷയും മാപ്പും:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_17.html

    ഭീകരതയുടെ നിറംമാറ്റം:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_09.html

    ജിഹാദ്:
    http://islam-malayalam.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_02.html

    2011, ഫെബ്രുവരി 14, തിങ്കളാഴ്‌ച

    The Hindu corrects and retracts—what of graver mistakes?

    http://www.countermedia.in/?p=496

    January 24, 2011
    By admin
    By Yaseen Ashraf
    The Hindu online edition carried an interesting retraction yesterday (January 23, 2011) and repeated it in today’s print edition. It was about a news item titled “Expunge remarks against Graham Staines: Supreme Court’s remarks ‘gratuitous,’ say editors, civil society members”, which had appeared in the print edition yesterday.
    The correction and retraction, signed by the Editor-in-Chief says: “It was wrongly stated in the report…that the statement was signed by N Ram, Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, Chandan Mitra, Editor-in-Chief of The Pioneer, and editorial representatives from The Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Indian Express, The Hindu, The Pioneer, and The Telegraph. We apologize for the serious blunder by our Special Correspondent, who inexplicably mistook the persons to whom the statement was emailed for publication, for the list of signatories.”
    What the Special Correspondent committed was at worst an unintentional gaffe, a one-time human error. The Editor-in-Chief has every right to see it as a serious slip because the erroneous report affected the editorial captains of newspapers. But The Hindu is yet to retract or apologize for deliberate, persistent and more serious violations of journalistic ethics by its then Associate Editor Praveen Swami in several reports about terror blasts. Those half-truths affected ordinary humans, not editorial celebrities.
    As soon as a blast occurred, Swami was at hand with his story in all its fine details, including list of culprits and quotes from mysterious “intelligence experts” who “spoke to The Hindu.”
    On September 9, 2006, the day of the Malegaon terror attack, Swami and Anupama Katakam wrote that the Malegaon bombings, preceded by a series of Hindutva attacks on mosques, were a sign of Islamist violence across the country. They went on to state: “…Javed Sheikh, a Pune-based Lashkar operative, played a key role in a 2003 attempt to bomb the Mumbai stock exchange. Before leaving to meet his Pakistani handlers at an Ahmedabad safe house, Sheikh spent several days at a Malegaon hotel with his lover and fellow operative, Ishrat Jehan Raza” By subsequent accounts, these two, Javed and Ishrat, whom The Hindu correspondents categorically incriminated, were innocents targeted by malignant forces. In fact they were later found to have been killed in fake encounters by the Gujarat police.
    Immediately after the Mecca Masjid bombing at Hyderabad in 2007, The Hindu (through its expert Praveen Swami) decided who the culprits were. In his news analysis titled “Behind the Mecca Masjid bombing” Swami stated with absolute certainty: “What the Mecca Masjid bombings make clear is that the Islamist threat to India’s cities remains in place, notwithstanding the decline in violence since the Mumbai serial bombings.” The story was accompanied by a photograph, with the caption reading: “The street leading to the house of `Bilal,’ suspected to be the mastermind who planned the Hyderabad blasts, in Moosaram Bagh.” The story itself began with detailed descriptions of “Bilal’s” house, painting it and the streets leading to it in menacing colours.
    In the wake of the Ajmer blasts of October 2007, Praveen Swami saw the role of “Salafi Islam in targeting the syncretic shrines in the subcontinent that represent popular Islam”.
    On October 14, 2007 The Hindu carried another Praveen Swami report on its front page under the heading “New leads tie Ajmer blast to HUJI”. The disclosure this time was that the “SIM card reveals Hyderabad link”. The report stated: “In both the Mecca Masjid and Ajmer terror strikes, the bomb-maker who fabricated the explosive devices had the phone’s speaker connected to a detonator implanted in nitroglycerine-based industrial explosive…Andhra Pradesh police investigators believe that the Mecca Masjid strikes were carried out by two or more Bangladesh-based HUJI operatives, who planted the explosives in the mosque and left India soon after.”
    Muslim groups attacking Muslim shrine? Yes, said Swami, and explained why: “What the Mecca Masjid bombings make clear is that the Islamist threat to India’s cities remains in place, notwithstanding the decline in violence since the Mumbai serial bombings. Under intense pressure from the United States and Europe, Pakistan has been compelled to rein in the Lashkar. Attacks on mosques, Islamist terror groups appear to hope, will be blamed on Hindu fundamentalist organizations — and thus provide the pretext they need to throw off the shackles.”
    As usual, Swami reeled off several “terrorist” names. The Hindu reiterated this version in its editorial “Challenge of Islamist terror”.
    Irresponsible reports like Swami’s (of which more examples will be available to anyone who cares to google) helped perpetrate state terrorism against several innocent persons, as is evident from Swami Aseemanand’s confession before a magistrate. The Hindu owes them an apology, and owes it to its readers to retract the erroneous and unverified reports of Praveen Swami.
    Yaseen Ashraf is a well-known media critic

    2011, ഫെബ്രുവരി 13, ഞായറാഴ്‌ച

    Ajmer Dargah blast bomb-maker held

    http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article867061.ece

    SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

    JAIPUR, 
    November 4, 2010


    The Hindu
    He is also a main accused in Best Bakery carnage
    The Rajasthan Anti-Terror Squad has arrested the bomb-maker in the Ajmer Dargah blast case. He happens to be a main accused in the Vadodara Best Bakery carnage also.
    Harshad Bhai Solanki alias Munna alias Raj, belonging to the Hanuman Tekri Katchi Basti of Vadodara, was nabbed in Gujarat and brought here and arrested on Monday. A court here remanded him to police custody till November 9.
    Harshad Bhai was an accomplice of Sunil Joshi, main accused in the October 2007 Ajmer blast case and remained with him till the latter was murdered at Dewas in Madhya Pradesh on December 29, 2007.
    Additional Director-General of Police Kapil Garg, who is also in-charge of the ATS, said Harshad played an active role in gathering bomb-making material, assembling them and packaging the bombs to Ajmer.

    BEST BAKERY INCIDENT

    Mr. Garg said the accused confessed to his involvement in the Best Bakery incident in which 14 persons were killed in arson by a mob of 500 persons on March 1, 2002. He was one of the 21 accused named in the FIR filed by Zahira Sheik, a kin of the victims, at the Pani Gate Police Station in Vadodara a day later.
    Harshad was acquitted by a fast track court in Gujarat in June 2003 after 16 months of trial along with the other accused, as 37 of the 73 witnesses turned hostile. The Gujarat High Court turned down a plea for appeal.
    The accused were again put to trial after the National Human Rights Commission took up the case on the basis of the eyewitness accounts from Zahira Sheik and a public interest litigation petition by social activist Teesta Setelwad in the Supreme Court.

    ABSCONDER

    In April 2004, the Supreme Court ordered that the case be tried in Maharashtra. “When 17 of the 21 accused in the Best Bakery case could be re-arrested, Harshad managed to escape. He was among the four who were absconding,” Mr. Garg said.
    While sentencing nine of the 17 accused to life term, the Maharashtra court issued arrest warrants against the four absconding. It acquitted eight others.
    Harshad was working in a team engaged in installation of mobile phone towers. His expertise was in fixing electrical components. It was during the period in hiding that he came across Sunil Joshi and conspired with him to carry out the Dargah blast, Mr. Garg said.

    ATS seeks permission for narco-test on Ajmer blast suspect

    http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article419699.ece    2.5.2011

    PTI
    Rajasthan Police has moved a court here for permission to conduct a narco-analysis test on alleged Hindu right-wing activist Devendra Gupta, arrested in connection with the 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast which left three dead and over 30 injured.
    “We have sought permission from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ajmer, to conduct narco-test on Gupta and a decision on it will be taken in the next hearing tomorrow,” Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) sources said today.
    The ATS has arrested three persons in the blast case - Devendra from Ajmer and Chandrashekhar and Vishnu Patidar from Madhya Pradesh. Gupta and Chandrashekar are on police remand and being interrogated by the ATS in Jaipur while the Patidar, who was apprehended yesterday, has been brought here.
    Gupta is suspected to be linked to Hindu outfit Abhinav Bharat, which is allegedly involved in the Malegaon blast.
    Police are also probing Gupta’s alleged links with Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, a key accused in the Malegaon blast case.
    Chandrasekhar, who is also suspected to have connections with Hindu right-wing groups, is alleged to be a key member of the terror module involved in the Ajmer blast, the sources said.
    Patidar was arrested by a five-member team of Rajasthan ATS from village Khardonkala in Shajapur district in Madhya Pradesh for his suspected involvement in the Ajmer blast, Additional Superintendent of Police Ramji Shrivastava said.

    CBI probes Ajmer terror suspects’ link with Mecca Masjid blast

    http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article419862.ece

    PTI 2.5.2010
    With the Anti Terrorist Squad of Rajasthan Police making a possible breakthrough in Ajmer blast, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has joined the probe to ascertain the role of arrested persons with the 2007 Mecca Masjid terror strike in Hyderabad.
    Official sources said a joint team of ATS, CBI and central security agencies were questioning two of three arrested persons - Davindra Gupta and Chandrashekar - in connection with their possible involvement in the Mecca Masjid blast.
    The role of the duo was purchasing of SIM cards and timer devices which were used to trigger the blast in Ajmer on October 12, 2007.
    Two pilgrims were killed and nine others, including a child, were injured in the terror attack when a crude bomb went off at the Sufi shrine of Khawaja Moinuddhin Chishti in Ajmer where thousands of devotees had gathered to break their day-long Ramzan fast.
    The low-intensity improvised bomb which was kept close to Aasthan-e-Noor went off a minute after the period of fast ended, indicating the similarity of execution timing with the Malegaon and Mecca Masjid blast.
    The probe had suggested that modus operandi, nature of explosives and the kind of bomb used in the Ajmer blast resemble Mecca Masjid blast in Hyderabad, the probe of which is being done by the CBI.
    The low-intensity improvised bomb which was kept in a tin box, with a packing of iron pipes, in Ajmer was similar to the contraption used in the Mecca blast, the sources said.
    CBI was refraining to comment on the issue officially, but the sources said a team had moved in to question the duo and their links with some of the accused identified by the agency in connection with the Mecca Masjid blasts.
    Five persons died in the blast and nine in the subsequent police firing outside the mosque on a Friday when thousands of Muslims gathered for prayers on May 18, 2007.

    Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More